Search for: "Supershuttle International, Inc."
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 5:00 am
In a recent Federal Court of Canada (the “FC”) decision, 2015 FC 1259, the FC dismissed an appeal by Supershuttle International, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:30 am
SuperShuttle Intern., Inc., Slip Copy, 2010 WL 419964 (D. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
SuperShuttle International, Inc., --- F.3d ----, No. 10-3310, 2011 WL 3890326 (8th Cir. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Southern Shuttle Services, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:07 am
[Refusal to register the mark FLEXTONE GAME CALLS DIRTY LIL’ HEN for "hunting game calls" [GAME CALLS and HEN disclaimed] in view of the registered mark DIRTY LITTLE DOE, also for hunting game calls [DOE disclaimed].In re SuperShuttle International, Inc., Serial No. 85765129 (November 14, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:10 am
Ruling’s Significance Pellegrini says the new decision “provides a roadmap for how the Board will apply its new independent contractor analysis articulated in SuperShuttle DFW, Inc. earlier this year. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
SuperShuttle International, Inc.pdf, Case No. 10-3310, U.S. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:00 pm
SuperShuttle International, Inc., 653 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir. 2011), which found that whether the Section 1 exemption applied was a question of arbitrability for the arbitrator when the parties delegated such questions to the arbitrator. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
The Board noted that the Respondent's unit employees, who were not members of Local 1125 at the time of the merger, were not included in the merger process because nonmembers do not have a right under the International Union's constitution or the Local's bylaws to participate in internal union matters such as a merger discussion or vote. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:19 am
SuperShuttle Int’l, Inc., 653 F.3d 766 (8th Cir. 2011). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
SuperShuttle International, Inc., 653 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir. 2011), which found that whether the Section 1 exemption applied was a question of arbitrability for the arbitrator when the parties delegated such questions to the arbitrator. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:04 am
New Prime, Inc., May 12, 2017, Thompson, O.). [read post]
